In[]:=
teg=ResourceFunction["TokenEventGraph"][{{u_,v_}:>Values[substitutionLemmas[u,v,"Uniquify"->True,"Canonicalize"->True]]},{(a_·b_)<->(b_)},3,"TokenLabeling"->False,"TokenMultiplicity"->Automatic,"EventDeduplication"->True,AspectRatio->1];labeledTeg=ResourceFunction["TokenEventGraph"][{{u_,v_}:>Values[substitutionLemmas[u,v,"Uniquify"->True,"Canonicalize"->True]]},{(a_·b_)<->(b_)},3,"TokenLabeling"->True,"TokenMultiplicity"->Automatic,"EventDeduplication"->True,AspectRatio->1];
In[]:=
teg
Out[]=
In[]:=
HighlightGraph[EdgeFix[teg],Style[twoWayRuleFix[a_·(b_·(c_·(d_·(e_·((f_·(g_·h_))·i_)))))i_],Red,PointSize[.03]]]
Out[]=
In[]:=
proof=findProof[EdgeFix@teg,{(a·b)↔(b)},a·(b·(c·(d·(e·((f·(g·h))·i)))))↔i(*a·(b·(c·(d·((e·f)·g))))↔h·(i·g)*)(*a·(b·((c·d)·((e·f)·g)))↔h·(i·g)*)]
Out[]=
{(a·b↔b){Event,1,1},(a·b↔b){Event,1,1},(a·b↔b){Event,1,519},(a·b↔b){Event,1,519},(a·(b·c)↔c){Event,1,3},(a·(b·c)↔c){Event,1,15},(a·(b·c)↔c){Event,1,15},(a·(b·(c·(d·e)))↔e){Event,1,616},(a·((b·(c·d))·e)↔e){Event,1,616},((a·b)·c↔c){Event,1,3},((a·b)·c↔d·(e·c)){Event,1,460},((a·b)·(c·(d·e))↔e){Event,1,460},{Event,1,1}(a·(b·c)↔c),{Event,1,3}((a·b)·c↔d·(e·c)),{Event,1,3}((a·b)·(c·(d·e))↔e),{Event,1,15}(a·((b·(c·d))·e)↔e),{Event,1,460}(a·(b·(c·(d·e)))↔e),{Event,1,519}((a·b)·c↔c),{Event,1,616}(a·(b·(c·(d·(e·((f·(g·h))·i)))))↔i)}
In[]:=
ResourceFunction["MultiwaySystem"][{"AB"->"B","B"->"AB"},{"AB","B"},3,"StatesGraph"]
Out[]=
"ABB"
{lhs,rhs}
In[]:=
Clear[StringApply]
In[]:=
StringApply[lhs1_->rhs1_,lhs2_->rhs2_]:=Rule@@@Tuples[{Prepend[StringReplaceList[lhs2,lhs1->rhs1],lhs2],Prepend[StringReplaceList[rhs2,lhs1->rhs1],rhs2]}]
In[]:=
StringApply["AB"->"A","ABAB"->"ABA"]
Out[]=
{ABABABA,ABABAA,AABABA,AABAA,ABAABA,ABAAA}
In[]:=
NestList[Union[Flatten[{#,Outer[StringApply,#,#]}]]&,{"A"->"AA","AA"->"A"},2]
Out[]=
{{AAA,AAA},{AA,AAA,AAAA,AAA,AAAA,AAAAA,AAAA,AAAAA},{AA,AAA,AAAA,AAAAA,AAAAAA,AAA,AAAA,AAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAAAAA,AAAA,AAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAAAAA,AAAAAAAA,AAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAAAAA,AAAAAAAA,AAAAAAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAAAAA,AAAAAAAA,AAAAAAAAA}}
In[]:=
NestList[Union[Flatten[{#,Outer[StringApply,#,#]}]]&,{"A"->"AA"},2]
Out[]=
{{AAA},{AAA,AAAA,AAAA,AAAAA},{AAA,AAAA,AAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAA,AAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAAAAA,AAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAAAAA,AAAAAAAA,AAAAAA,AAAAAAA,AAAAAAAA,AAAAAAAAA}}
In[]:=
ResourceFunction["TokenEventGraph"][{{r1_Rule,r2_Rule}:>StringApply[r1,r2]},{"A"->"AA"},2,"TokenMultiplicity"->Automatic,AspectRatio->1]
Out[]=
In[]:=
ResourceFunction["TokenEventGraph"][{{r1_Rule,r2_Rule}:>StringApply[r1,r2]},{"A"->"AA"},1,"TokenMultiplicity"->Automatic,AspectRatio->1]
Out[]=
In[]:=
ResourceFunction["TokenEventGraph"][{{r1_Rule,r2_Rule}:>StringApply[r1,r2]},{"A"->"B"},2,"TokenMultiplicity"->Automatic,AspectRatio->1]
Out[]=
[Whatever you start from, you get “reflexivity” A↔A ]
[Whatever you start from, you get “reflexivity” A↔A ]
[[ Strings have the extra features that they can be spliced at any point ]] [[ whereas expressions with binary operators can only have “predefined subtrees” extracted ]]
[[ Strings have the extra features that they can be spliced at any point ]] [[ whereas expressions with binary operators can only have “predefined subtrees” extracted ]]
Ruliology of Accumulative String-Rule Substitution Systems
Ruliology of Accumulative String-Rule Substitution Systems
[[ similar to multiway based on numbers ]]
[[ similar to multiway based on numbers ]]
Proofs on Strings
Proofs on Strings
Something is wrong with this::::
Writing out a proof
Writing out a proof
rule XXX applied to XXX gives XXX [[ the rule is applied at position ____ ]]
Application to Hypergraphs
Application to Hypergraphs
link-eme
Alternative view of strings
Alternative view of strings
Then there is a metarule picks up linked pieces
Analogy
Analogy
combinators / WM : machine code
combinators / WM : machine code
string rewrites / symbolic system : assembler [still has names]
string rewrites / symbolic system : assembler [still has names]
Identifying high-level constructs from the machine code is reverse engineering
Identifying high-level constructs from the machine code is reverse engineering
Analog of particles is probably robust mathematical concepts
Analog of particles is probably robust mathematical concepts
Estimate the Size of Mathematics
Estimate the Size of Mathematics
Metamath / LEAN : assembler
Machine code: take every identifier and represent it “in binary” [ emic ]
Metamath / LEAN : assembler
Machine code: take every identifier and represent it “in binary” [ emic ]
Machine code: take every identifier and represent it “in binary” [ emic ]
At a low level there may be lots of emes to create math ideas that are “obvious” from our physical experience
At a low level there may be lots of emes to create math ideas that are “obvious” from our physical experience
Just as lots of space emes [“spacemes”] are needed to build space
Math as it exists today vs. the region of physical space that we’ve explored
Math as it exists today vs. the region of physical space that we’ve explored
What fraction of math have we explored
What fraction of math have we explored
Eme Level
Eme Level
An eme: a fundamental element with distinct “UUID” [“morpheme”]
An eme: a fundamental element with distinct “UUID” [“morpheme”]
Emic level [“morphological level”]
Emic level [“morphological level”]
[[ Language of things you can make out of emes ]] [“morphology”] [ emology ] < rules at the eme level >
[[ Language of things you can make out of emes ]] [“morphology”] [ emology ] < rules at the eme level >
< What can happen at the eme level >
< What can happen at the eme level >